A comparison between Relational Databases and NoSQL Databases.
There are two main types of databases, relational and non-relational. The major difference between them is how they handle data.
Relational databases are structured. You have tables and these tables may have dependencies on each other, or relationships. A database for a store will have a table for customers and one for orders. These two tables are related, because an order is made by a customer.
Non-relational databases are document-oriented. This so called document type storage allows multiple ‘categories’ of data to be stored in one construct or Document. So using the previous example, a Customer document, would have the customer’s information, a sub-category for all their orders, etc.
A relational database uses SQL which is short for Structured Query Language. This is a fairly rigid and standard way of storing data using tables, columns and rows. Columns represent the data point to be stored and a row represents a record with data points per column that has been defined. These are defined in a table which is usually atomic in nature; this means that a table should really only store data records on one entity or object at a time. Eg. A Table Customers should ONLY be storing customer records.
When additional details are required, or data needs to be associated with a record from one table to another, then we have what we call relationships. A common key is established between the two (or more) tables and this is used for that association there after.
Unlike its relational counterparts, no-sql databases allow far more flexibility and adaptability as you design your application. If your data requirements aren’t clear at the outset or if you’re dealing with massive amounts of unstructured data, you may not have the luxury of developing a relational database with clearly defined tables and relationships.
NoSQL databases are document-oriented. Instead of using tables, these documents allow us to store unstructured data in a single document. So a document could contain a customer’s details, as well as all their orders to date, their favourites, etc. Thi is more intuitive and requires fewer hops across tables to find all the data relating to a customer. Note however that this results in a need for additional processing effort and more storage as the document sizes grow. The storage will not be as highly organized at with an Relational Database.